1	Sustainable Faculty Technology Development to Facilitate a New University Culture
2	Context Polytechnic campus part of the University system Campus size 3,448 Students (2007-08) 39 FT Faculty Regional information Center of the High Tech Corridor 8.5 m people live within 100 mile radius
3	Faculty Technology Integration Institute (FTII) Design Based on Florida Professional Development Protocol System National Staff Development Standards Voluntary Through application Slots funded each year Faculty or other instructional employees
4	FTII Characteristics Intensive Academy 5 days (non-consecutive) Interdisciplinary Monthly meetings Mentorship Semester Reflections Action Research
5	Intensive Academy Included presentation by many campus units Vendors and Partners Needs Assessment Review of topics covered
6	Participants
7	Participant Technology Skill
8	Program Learning Objectives Participants will be able to…. Implement new technologies in the process of scholarship, discovery, application, and teaching during each semester. Implement new technologies that are facilitated through the use of incentives, a peer learning community, and interdepartmental support made possible with USFP resources. Present, publish, and communicate with peers and the scholarly community to measure the successes and challenges of using the learned technological innovation(s).
9	Outcomes
10	Other Introduced Skills Webquests (6) Educational Research (11) Web 2.0 Tools (4) SoftChalk (5) Smart Podium and other tools (20) Student Response System -CPS (6) SMARTboards (5)
11	FTII testimonials
12	Media Services Faculty successes after FTII sessions: Increased awareness of classroom technology offerings and technical support services. Asking for help One on one teaching moments Help calls Phone call (room phones) Help button (on Crestron) Technical support during instructional sessions Media personnel assigned to support classrooms Online AV requests Extra classroom technology (not in podiums)
13	Media Services Faculty successes after FTII sessions: Comfort level with the smart podium classrooms. Operation of various technologies Understanding the technologies available Comfort level with the other classroom technology offerings. Digital document cameras Laptops hookups Smartboards (Sympodiums) Comfort level with the Videoconference classes to distant sites. Best Practices Technical support Operation of stand alone unit or a full service unit Responsibilities of faculty for both types of VC systems
14	Library Faculty requesting information literacy sessions for their students that never had before More requests for help by faculty and division directors for T&P More requests for help in digitizing media for use in online classes à policy + process with TLT and Media Resource More webquests à faculty more attuned to information literacy and validated scholarly sources of information
15	ERDC Faculty Technology Integration Institute (FTII) members require less “Level One” support. Creates the opportunity to disseminate updated policies and procedures. Creates the opportunity to demonstrate new technology resources. Encourages participants to utilize resources readily available and with reduced need for assistance. Establishes campus wide technology standards.
16	On-line Surveys - IREP Observations: Improved quality of survey design. Recognition of the survey tools available and how to use them. IREP’s there to help Significant increase of on-line survey use. Improved decision support Better understanding of IRB and its process.
17	Results Interdisciplinary connections Reduction of fear and increase of risk taking Self-reflection Increase of online course development Culture change Technology (in many formats) has generally been accepted as an integral part of the academic future of the USFP by faculty and other instructional staff.
18	Future Steps & Program Success Student Development Program Adjunct Development Program Future Sessions on New Applications Awarded a 7^th Annual Excellence in Employee Development Award (University of North Florida) Cross Campus sharing and collaboration
19	Contact Information Naomi Boyer, nboyer@poly.usf.edu Kevin Calkins, kcalkins@poly.usf.edu Karen Konrath, karen@poly.usf.edu Catherine Lavallée-Welch, clw@poly.usf.edu